Difference between revisions of "Template:Classic RAD (1)"

From ICA-AtoM
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Main Page > BCAUL pilot project > Templates > Classic RAD (1) '''Document status:''' in progress This version of the RAD template follows RAD's ''areas of description'' close...)
 
(Removing all content from page)
 
(38 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Main Page]] > [[BCAUL pilot project]] > [[Templates]] > Classic RAD (1)
 
'''Document status:''' in progress
 
  
 
This version of the RAD template follows RAD's ''areas of description'' closely. It differs from [[Template: Classic RAD (2)|Classic RAD (2)]] in the way it handles RAD elements that have no direct ISAD(G) or Qubit analog by creating custom fields (records in the Qubit ''property'' table).
 
 
*'''Advantage''': descriptions are more fully RAD-compliant, data is more easily segregated into RAD elements with little loss of RAD specificity.
 
 
*'''Disadvantage''': requires much back-end customization to implement fields that are little-used even in RAD environments.
 
 
== Structure ==
 
 
== Identity area ==
 
 
== Title and statement of responsibility area ==
 
 
== Edition area ==
 
 
== Class of material specific details ==
 
 
== Creation context ==
 
 
== Physical description area ==
 
 
== Publisher's series area ==
 
 
== Archival description area ==
 
 
== Notes area ==
 
 
== Access points ==
 
 
== Control area / Digital object / Storage location ==
 

Latest revision as of 11:47, 28 August 2008

Please note that ICA-AtoM is no longer actively supported by Artefactual Systems.
Visit https://www.accesstomemory.org for information about AtoM, the currently supported version.