Difference between revisions of "FNC-1.2.1"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<span class="pageTitle">Describe archival materials at multiple levels of description</span> | <span class="pageTitle">Describe archival materials at multiple levels of description</span> | ||
− | [[Main Page]] > [[System | + | [[Main Page]] > [[System requirements]] > [[Functional requirements]] |
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Archivists must be able to describe materials at multiple [[Level of descripiton|levels]], reflecting the levels of arrangement. | Archivists must be able to describe materials at multiple [[Level of descripiton|levels]], reflecting the levels of arrangement. | ||
− | + | Descriptions at lower [[Level of description|levels]] should inherit information from higher [[Level of description|levels]] (e.g. [[Creator|creator]]). | |
− | + | Descriptions at higher [[Level of description|levels]] should be consistent with information at lower [[Level of description|levels]] (e.g. dates and extent). | |
The application must support multi-level description with inheritance and consistency across [[Level of description|levels]]. | The application must support multi-level description with inheritance and consistency across [[Level of description|levels]]. | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
'''Context (parent requirements)''' | '''Context (parent requirements)''' | ||
− | + | [[FR-1|FR-1 Establish a system of control]] | |
− | + | [[FR-1.2|FR-1.2 Establish systems of intellectual control]] | |
− | '''Source | + | '''Source quotations''' |
− | + | [[RS-1#i.8|ISAD(G) I.8]] | |
− | + | [[RS-1#1|ISAD(G) Section 1]] | |
− | + | [[RS-1#2|ISAD(G) Section 2]] | |
− | + | [[RS-4#1.1.1|OSARIS 1.1.1]] | |
− | + | [[RS-4#2.1.1|OSARIS 2.1.1]] | |
'''Associated metadata requirements''' | '''Associated metadata requirements''' | ||
− | + | [[MTD-1.1.3|MTD-1.1.3 Indicate the level of descripiton]] | |
'''Associated quality requirements''' | '''Associated quality requirements''' | ||
− | + | Provide drop-down lists to select level of description. | |
− | + | Provide pick-lists to select parent level of desription / assign position in hierarchy of arrangement. | |
− | + | Show inherited information at lower levels of descripiton. | |
− | + | Calculate values at higher levels of description from lower (e.g. date ranges). | |
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
'''ICA-AtoM implementation''' | '''ICA-AtoM implementation''' | ||
− | + | ICA-AtoM ships with a default schema for levels of description (fonds, sub-fonds, series, sub-series, file, item). Administrators can edit to reflect institutional policy / terminology. | |
− | + | ICA-AtoM imposes no limits on the number of levels that can be used. A unit's position in the hierarchy is determined by the value selected in the <span class="field">Parent level</span> field. | |
− | + | A description is recognized as the highest level when the <span class="field">Parent level</span> field is blank. | |
− | + | ''Discrete items'' (items not linked to a higher parent level) are permitted: simply leave the <span class="field">Parent level</span> blank. | |
'''Known issues''' | '''Known issues''' | ||
− | + | ICA-AtoM (v1.0 beta) cannot currently calculate values at higher levels from lower (e.g. date range); these must be manually entered at each level. The application does not enforce consistency. | |
'''Use cases''' | '''Use cases''' | ||
− | + | [[USC-1.2.1|USC-1.2.1 Implement an arrangement policy]] | |
'''User Manual sections''' | '''User Manual sections''' | ||
− | + | [[UM-3.1.4|UM-3.1.4 Add / edit content > Archival descriptions > Data entry: Identity area]] |
Revision as of 17:32, 3 July 2008
Please note that ICA-AtoM is no longer actively supported by Artefactual Systems.
Visit https://www.accesstomemory.org for information about AtoM, the currently supported version.
Describe archival materials at multiple levels of description
Main Page > System requirements > Functional requirements
Specification
Archivists must be able to describe materials at multiple levels, reflecting the levels of arrangement.
Descriptions at lower levels should inherit information from higher levels (e.g. creator).
Descriptions at higher levels should be consistent with information at lower levels (e.g. dates and extent).
The application must support multi-level description with inheritance and consistency across levels.
Context (parent requirements)
FR-1 Establish a system of control
FR-1.2 Establish systems of intellectual control
Source quotations
Associated metadata requirements
MTD-1.1.3 Indicate the level of descripiton
Associated quality requirements
Provide drop-down lists to select level of description.
Provide pick-lists to select parent level of desription / assign position in hierarchy of arrangement.
Show inherited information at lower levels of descripiton.
Calculate values at higher levels of description from lower (e.g. date ranges).
Associated technical requirements
ICA-AtoM implementation
ICA-AtoM ships with a default schema for levels of description (fonds, sub-fonds, series, sub-series, file, item). Administrators can edit to reflect institutional policy / terminology.
ICA-AtoM imposes no limits on the number of levels that can be used. A unit's position in the hierarchy is determined by the value selected in the Parent level field.
A description is recognized as the highest level when the Parent level field is blank.
Discrete items (items not linked to a higher parent level) are permitted: simply leave the Parent level blank.
Known issues
ICA-AtoM (v1.0 beta) cannot currently calculate values at higher levels from lower (e.g. date range); these must be manually entered at each level. The application does not enforce consistency.
Use cases
USC-1.2.1 Implement an arrangement policy
User Manual sections
UM-3.1.4 Add / edit content > Archival descriptions > Data entry: Identity area